It may be a useful screening instrument for conducting cognitive assessments in community-dwelling elderly. The tester needs to follow the administration procedures exactly and. The results of the CFA indicated an acceptable fit between the Chinese version of the RBANS and the original.Ĭonclusions : The Chinese version of the RBANS had relatively good reliability and validity in a community-dwelling elderly sample. As with any scale, the degree to which the MMSE is reliable and valid is critical. The total RBANS score was highly correlated with that of the MMSE (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), and the RBANS subtests also demonstrated strong correlations with most of the MMSE subtests. The RBANS total score showed strong internal consistency (r = 0.806), and the coefficient  value for each of the RBANS scales ranged from 0.142 to 0.727. The mean total score on the RBANS was 86.02 (☑4.19). Results : The final sample of participants included 236 community-dwelling elderly. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the construct validity. Correlations between each of the RBANS and MMSE subtests were conducted to measure the concurrent validity. To test for internal consistency, Cronbach’s  was calculated for all six RBANS indices. They completed a questionnaire concerning demographic information, the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Chinese version of the RBANS. Material and methods : All subjects come from the community-dwelling elderly in Shanghai, China. The present study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the RBANS in community-dwelling elderly. Introduction : The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a widely used screening instrument in neuropsychological assessment and is a brief, individually administered measure.

Mmse reliability and validity